But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". Authors should treat all communication with the Journal as confidential which includes correspondence with direct representatives from the Journal such as Editors-in-Chief and/or Handling Editors and reviewers reports unless explicit consent has been received to share information. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. In total a short communication should be no longer than 1000 words in length and should contain no more than three to four figures and about 20 references. Further information is available from the International Cell Line Authentication Committee (ICLAC). For manuscripts reporting studies involving vulnerable groups where there is the potential for coercion or where consent may not have been fully informed, extra care will be taken by the editor and may be referred to the Springer Nature Research Integrity Group. For articles that are based primarily on the students dissertation or thesis, it is recommended that the student is usually listed as principal author: A Graduate Students Guide to Determining Authorship Credit and Authorship Order, APA Science Student Council 2006. Contributors seeking to publish a review are nevertheless encouraged to contact an Editor prior to submitting the article. If cells were bought from a life science company the following need to be given in the manuscript: name of company (that provided the cells), cell type, number of cell line, and batch of cells. single or double blind peer review) as well as per journal subject discipline. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of participants is inadequate protection of anonymity. Please make sure that the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that addresses and affiliations are current. Why is my manuscript still "Under consideration" even though it has already been 19 days? Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Please see the various examples of wording below and revise/customize the sample statements according to your own needs. Variance of type size within an illustration should be minimal, e.g., do not use 8-pt type on an axis and 20-pt type for the axis label. Authors should include the following statements (if applicable) in a separate section entitled Compliance with Ethical Standards when submitting a paper: Please note that standards could vary slightly per journal dependent on their peer review policies (i.e. The following resource provides insights into manuscript status tracking: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses [Handbook]. ), Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that an independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. Nature Communications is an open access journal that publishes high-quality research in biology, health, physics, chemistry, Earth sciences, and all related areas. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [full name], [full name] and [full name]. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in If there is no change after that, you could politely inquire via email about the status, mentioning your concerns about no change in the status. 42, 207219. Conceptualization: [full name], ; Methodology: [full name], ; Formal analysis and investigation: [full name], ; Writing - original draft preparation: [full name, ]; Writing - review and editing: [full name], ; Funding acquisition: [full name], ; Resources: [full name], ; Supervision: [full name],. The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due [REASON(S) WHY DATA ARE NOT PUBLIC] but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.]. [CDATA[> It is strongly recommended to suggest a mix of reviewers from different countries and different institutions. Type manuscript in English, double-spaced on numbered pages with 1- to 1.5-inch margins. The research leading to these results received funding from [] under Grant Agreement No[]. Editors decide whether to send a manuscript for peer review based on the degree to which it advances our understanding of the field, the soundness of conclusions, the extent to which the evidence presented - including appropriate data and analyses - supports these conclusions, and the wide relevance of these conclusions to the journals readership. The portal also provides authors links so that they can quickly register a new resource and obtain an RRID. Verbal informed consent was obtained prior to the interview. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final . If any magnification is used in the photographs, indicate this by using scale bars within the figures themselves. Data availability statements can take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one if required for multiple datasets): 1. Upon transfer, if the manuscript is assessed by the receiving journal to be a good fit and technically sound, it may be accepted without further review. Please note that the Journal may not use the suggestions, but suggestions are appreciated and may help facilitate the peer review process. - 138.197.94.209. Review articles therefore require a disclosure statement.Other article types such as editorials, book reviews, comments (amongst others) may, dependent on their content, require a disclosure statement. More information about the manuscript transfer service can be found here. ISSN 2398-9629 (online). Authors should provide the appropriate attribution for republished images. Figures should always be cited in text in consecutive numerical order. Please see Springer Natures information on recommended repositories. Once your manuscript has been finalised, click on the 'Approve Submission' button to submit your manuscript for consideration. If your manuscript contains any individual persons data in any form (including any individual details, images or videos), consent for publication must be obtained from that person, or in the case of children, their parent or legal guardian. One author is assigned as Corresponding Author and acts on behalf of all co-authors and ensures that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately addressed. The data reproduced from Article X utilized human tissue that was procured via our Biobank AB, which provides de-identified samples. Authors should make sure they have permissions for the use of software, questionnaires/(web) surveys and scales in their studies (if appropriate). The Corresponding Author is responsible for the following requirements: * The requirement of managing all communication between the journal and all co-authors during submission and proofing may be delegated to a Contact or Submitting Author. If the editor decides to send the manuscript to peer reviewers, they will contact researchers with relevant expertise. salami-slicing/publishing). If there is suspicion of misbehavior or alleged fraud the Journal and/or Publisher will carry out an investigation following COPE guidelines. All authors are requested to make sure that all data and materials as well as software application or custom code support their published claims and comply with field standards. This information will automatically be added to the Record of CrossMark, however it is not added to the manuscript itself. These guidelines describe authorship principles and good authorship practices to which prospective authors should adhere to. In order to give people of all abilities and disabilities access to the content of your figures, please make sure that. The manuscript should not be submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. Springer Nature advocates complete and transparent reporting of biomedical and biological research and research with biological applications. Research articles and non-research articles (e.g. This may be a correction or retraction. This is especially true concerning images of vulnerable people (e.g. Authors may request that their paper be reinstated one more time under a new DOI. In this case please make sure the Corresponding Author is clearly indicated in the manuscript. MS Office files are also acceptable. The statement should include details of any grants received (please give the name of the funding agency and grant number). Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through the following editorial process: The journals editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. The reason will be given in the published erratum/correction, expression of concern or retraction note. Author C has received speaker and consultant honoraria from Company M. Dr. C has received speaker honorarium and research funding from Company M and Company N. Author D has received travel support from Company O. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Figure parts should be denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c, etc.). Online: 5. The editor is reading your manuscript and figuring out whether or not she wants to send it for peer review. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [full name] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Cite in the text by italic Arabic numerals in parentheses, set on the text line, numbered in the order they appear. Concurrent or secondary publication is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors own (plagiarism). This step will alert authors to possible problems with the cell line and may save considerable time and effort. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. For small-sized journals, the figures should be 119 mm wide and not higher than 195 mm. Sample statements for "Consent to participate": Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. . Images will be removed from publication if authors have not obtained informed consent or the paper may be removed and replaced with a notice explaining the reason for removal. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the IRB of XYZ. The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figure(s) 1a, 1b and 1c.. Definition: Photographs, drawings, or paintings with fine shading, etc. To appeal against a decision, or transfer your submission to another journalAppeals and Transfers. You might also want to check what the different statuses displayed by the journal are, e.g., does it specify peer reviewer assigned, peer review complete, etc., as separate steps? This is because you have been informed that your paper is under consideration for publication. For vector graphics, the preferred format is EPS; for halftones, please use TIFF format. If they are an author or have any other competing interest regarding a specific manuscript, another Editor or member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to assume responsibility for overseeing peer review. For authors that are (temporarily) unaffiliated we will only capture their city and country of residence, not their e-mail address unless specifically requested. Authors are strongly advised to ensure the author group, the Corresponding Author, and the order of authors are all correct at submission. Before final acceptance, we request that corresponding authors of accepted papers link their Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID) to their manuscript tracking system account ORCID instructions. Data citations should include a persistent identifier (such as a DOI), should be included in the reference list using the minimum information recommended by DataCite, and follow journal style. Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all necessary information at this stage. [CDATA[> and JavaScript. Examples of statements to be used when ethics approval has been obtained: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Reprints and/or a final PDF file are available to authors at standard rates when ordered prior to publication. Other declarations include Funding, Competing interests, Ethics approval, Consent, Data and/or Code availability and Authors contribution statements. 6. Disclosure of interests provides a complete and transparent process and helps readers form their own judgments of potential bias. //-->